Jump to content

Talk:Nicholas Medforth-Mills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The following writing is careless:

. To start. the nomination was not in any way proper, because it was not tagged on this article. Shilkanni (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pretender

[edit]

He is the potential next-in-line pretender to the Roumania throne. His cousins and sister aren't that notable, but because he stands a chance of being the possible pretender sometime in the near future (his grandfather is in his eighties) he should at least be kept. Morhange 18:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Morhange. He is actually quite likely to become the pretender when his grandfather, aunt, and mother die (or possibly just grandfather and aunt, depending). I'm removing the proposed deletion business. Sent it to AfD if you want. john k 18:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

[edit]

Still an unsourced stub. References are not optional, and websites aren't generally reliable sources. If the subject is notable, reliable sources will exist. If they don't, the article shouldn't be here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts of the article are unsourced? I can add a reliable source, but what exactly needs to be sourced? Morhange 00:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that the claim to be 84th in line to the British throne and 3rd in line to the Romanian one strike me as the sort of things that need references. If, as John says below, there is some doubt as to who ex-King Michael wants to succeed him as non-King of Romania, that would be sensible to include as well. Doesn't Debretts, or similar works on European nobility, cover this sort of thing ? Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Surely some websites can be treated as more or less reliable sources. Paul Theroff's Online Gotha has always proved reliable when checked against printed sources, for instance. The basic genealogical information is widely known, and easily available. I'd imagine Burke's Royal Families of the World lists him, for a start. The idea of him as third in line for the Romanian throne should certainly be sourced, however. According to this website, linked on our page about King Michael, he declared in 1997 that Margarita would be his heir as head of the Royal House of Romania, but not actually heir to the throne of Romania, whose succession laws he did not have standing to unilaterally change. It also says that Elena is second in line, leading to the conclusion that Nicholas is probably next. But we should get a better source than that. john k 01:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(especially since said website contains some glaring errors, like calling George IV "William III" - probably just a brain fart, rather than due to actual ignorance, but still unfortunate). john k 01:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

surname

[edit]

I read somewhere that he (or his mother on his behalf) prefers and wants him to be known and used under surname "de Roumanie" (or Roumanie...) - what is the actual name he uses, in real life? This needs to be investigated from real sources, and then the name this article be in accordance with "best known as" principle. Maed 05:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's best known as Nicholas Medforth-Mills. I think the de Roumanie precedes his surname. Morhange 17:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sneaky delete procedure

[edit]

This article was in Afd (Nov 2007) really really sneakily. As part of a list of seven to-be-deleteds. Either the proposer of the deletion is a supporter of Hohenzollern male-line succession bias, or was unaware of the stated succession designations/wishes of king Michael I of Romania. The result of that AfD should be reverted. Shilkanni (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRYSTAL. There is not enough unique, personal information on Nicholas to warrant a separate article and the nuances and less subtle aspects of the succession are discussed at the article Line of succession to the Romanian throne. Coverage here would be a carbon-copy of coverage there. Also, it is not in good faith to state something is sneaky when it really was not. Charles 06:46, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting view. Really exceptional. Particularly that claim that the succession is sufficiently discussed at the referred article, because as of this date, there appears no mention about Nicholas Medforth-Mills. Interesting attempt for, how should it be expressed, sort of misinformation. I would regard that somewhat sneaky. Shilkanni (talk) 14:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had accidentally put Line of succession to the Romanian throne instead of the intended Romanian Royal Family. You, however, are being blindly uncivil and not assuming good faith. The latter is a guideline but the former is Wikipedia policy. Charles 14:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not (yet) a member of the Royal Family

[edit]

To quote the Fundamental Rules:

Article 2, Sec. 7: Nicholas de Roumanie Medforth-Mills, who shall assume the title, style and rank of Prince of Romania and Royal Highness (jure sanguinis) on 01 April 2010, upon his 25th anniversary, or immediately upon the demise of the current Head of the Royal House of Romania, which ever is sooner and at such a time shall enter the order of succession to the Headship of the Royal House of Romania, with full entitlement upon succeeding.

And:

Article 2, Sec. 10: Children or consorts of themembers of the Royal Family of Romania who do not bear a Royal title, are not members of the Royal Family of Romania, but members of the larger family of King Michael I and of the Royal House. A complete list of the larger family is included in the Genealogical Register of the Royal House of Romania.

Nicholas is not a member of the Royal Family, but he belongs to a dynastic group (the royal house). Charles 03:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Changed this talk title to reflect this reality accordingly. Lil' mouse (talk) 03:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

End of the line?

[edit]

Are we sure this is true: "The king took the decision that the royal family will come to an end after the 'reign and life' of his eldest daughter, Crown Princess Margarita."? I don't read Romanian, but English-language sources (see e.g. Romania Journal ) translate the King's statement as "King Mihai came to these decisions looking ahead the times when the life and reign of his daughter Margareta come to an end." That says nothing about the royal family itself coming to an end, only Margareta's life. Biblioteqa (talk) 16:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not really the nicholas a sister not yet 30 the king could make her a princess and third in line for throne (2601:40:C001:8713:4444:B18C:4C13:FD6E (talk) 16:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protection

[edit]

@@DrKiernan:: I think you should semi-protect this page indefinitely; these IPs are resilient and they won't stop. The last semi-protection worked fine. --Mihai (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Medforth-Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Nicholas Medforth-Mills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nicholas_Medforth-Mills&oldid=1203372198"